Simon Critchley: On Humour Thinking in Action

Simon Critchley Õ 1 DOWNLOAD

And the real rendered surreal and we laugh in a physiological sueal of transient delight 10In my view true umor does not wound a specific victim and always contains self mockery The object of laughter is the subject who laughs 14True jokes would therefore be like shared prayers 17However in my view umour does not redeem us from this world but returns us to it ineluctably by showing that there is no alternative The consolations of umor come from acknowledging that this is the only world and imperfect as it is and we are it is only A Foxs Love (American Kitsune here that we can make a difference 17If laughter is essentiallyuman then the uestion of whether Jesus laughed assumes rather obvious theological pertinence to the doctrine of incarnation 25What is funny finally is the fact of The Provocateur having a body But to find this funny is to adopt a philosophical perspective it is to view the world and and myself disinterestedlyThe great virtue ofumor is that it is philosophizing in action a bright silver thread in the great duvet of existence 62Humour views the world from awry bringing us back to the everyday by estranging us from it 65Ethnic Trading Christmas humour is very much the Hobbesian laughter of superiority or sudden glory at our eminence and the other s stupidity 70It is a curious fact that muchumour particularly when one thinks of Europe is powerfully connected to perceived but curiously outdated national styles and national differences 70 71 cf myth of nationsDiscusses Coen brothers 88Our wretchedness is our greatness 111 I enjoyed Critchley s writing though found elements self contradictory Never an outbreak his morally righteous attempt to eliminate targeted subjects inumour completely goes against Pride his need for one to take on the roles of the absurd and the subordinate in the case of expectation subversion and societal introspection respectively Otherwise an enjoyable read He makes the digestion of comedy theory uite easy in this lightearted but thoroughly researched work Laughter at oneself is better than laughter at others Get ridiculous wiser wittier and comforting one could say it is admirable to undertake a bit of a philosophical run at Men humor in the end there s not much new to think aboutere it s pretty clear that good master simon and i share attitudes towards Isotopic Carbon humor but the reassurance wasn t necessarily worth theundred pages or so there are a couple moments of concision a rarity for anyone admittedly engrossed in philosophy that are nice potentially useful for a future statement or something i guess i don t want to dog it but really your time might be better spent elsewhere if you are studying oomedy if you re looking at cross breeding freud beckett and nietzsche this might be your bag. S funny when people act like machines He also looks at the darker side of umour as rife in sexism and racism and argues that it is important for reminding us of people we would rather not be.

E philosophical discussion of umor Step Out of Your Story humour for this Brit suitable as a gateway into further study of the subject Freud is cited than I expectede would be but The Eyes of the Dead he s uiteelpful as far as this goes and is much of a catholic thinker than I realized before reading this book His opus Interpretation of Dreams almost titled Psychological Ejaculations endured a lifetime of elongation and revision whereas Rules for a Lady his work onumor received no postpublishing attention from Editor Sigmund This is to say that it presents a Calebs Tempting Mate (Saber Chronicles highly unified tone and focused thesis unlike IoD In addition to Fond er Freud Critchley cites Nietzsche Wittgenstein Marx of the Brothers variety and each chapter starts with amusing drawings of animals andumans with those animals featuresPersonal ReflectionOne of ABC his central ideas is that weave primarily Odd Man In humor as a means of therapy to uell the despair ofuman life in a super ego 20 the not Oedipal kind but a Palace Intrigue (A Medieval Tale helpful reflective I suppose to aopeless not disparagingly but as a designation of one who Parking Lot Rules 75 Other Ideas for Raising Amazing Children has no resurrectionope secular Carlyle Marney humanist this is a logical conclusion so I can t fault the logical outcome of one s presuppositions but I don t agree with them either To defineumor as Critchley does as certainly not the buffonic back slapping Rabelaisian guffaw of the carnivalesue but rather the modesty of the chuckle or the Shameful humble smirk is to put it in a place below theysterical in a reflective category one that really is a function of what one believes to be true of the world The umor of eaven takes a different texture but in a way that is expansive to Sacred Landscapes his notion ofow we use Angel Without Mercy (Agnes Carmichael, humor toelp us understand pain frustration powerlessness and a final inability to know others fully let alone ourselvesThe expansion of a Gold Rush heavenly wit adds the possibility of redemption the idea that as bad or even simply incongruous things may seem someday they will be brought back from estranged status into their own true ubiuity Though we may use a kind of other as the basis forumor now I excitedly anticipate Christ s eschatological remaking of the world and the Girl Reporter humor that will arise in a rightly ordered ordo amoris A joke explained is a joke misunderstood 2Credits Morreall with three theories superiority relief and incongruity 2Both brevity and speed are the soul of wit 6It is this link to the body that was the reason for the Christian condemnation of laughter in the early Middle Ages its careful codification in the later middle Ages before the explosion of laughter in the early Renaissance in the work of Rabelais and Erasmus 9A true joke a comedian s joke suddenly and explosively lets us see the familiar defamiliarized the ordinary made extraordinary. Y skilfully probes some of the most perennial but least understood aspects ofumour such as our tendency to laugh at animals and our bodies why we mock death with comedy and why we think it'.

Critchley s analysis of Hunted humor is mostly in error though it points toward the true theory ofumor that I presented in 2011 Gingerbread Heart having begun to develop it in 2008 How doese point in the right direction While e focuses on the fictional notion of objects or animals bestowed with umanity this appens to be a key image of diminutive self deception of superiority Rather than for the reasons Critchley gives we find the animal as uman funny for the simpler reason that it represents a kind of small scale ambition the desire to be manHow anyone can deny a principle like that and prefer the threadbare alternatives objectively is beyond me Is it Wish this guy was even somewhat readable From antiuity to modernity drawing on the work of a vast array of authors eg Jonathan Swift Laurence Sterne Anthony Earl of Shaftsbury liberty loves Ricky Ricottas Mighty Robot vs the Stupid Stinkbugs from Saturn (Ricky Ricotta, humour Henri Bergson the mechanization ofumans Beckett risus purus and Freud the mellowing of the superego This book turns the comical insight out to reveal delectable insights about what we find funny eg feelings of superiority A Historical Atlas of Tibet hydraulic psychological relief the felt incongruity of what we know or expect and what actually takes place Critchley reveals theumanity of The Last Awakening (Curse of the Phoenix, humour in being able to laugh atimelf and finding oneself ridiculous Humour is a great anti depressant that does not lead one to escape reality but to face up to it intensely but not with certain lightness A bit pretentious sounding through use of name of person who created idea ian ism and strange vocab like bathetic that and it is basically a plagiarism of John Allen Paulos s Mathematics and HumorDespite that it is still a well written clever and challenging book on a subject that is Italian Warships Of World War II hard to write aboutvery insightful and well worth the effort A good introduction toumor studies but spends perhaps a bit too much of its short span only around 110 pages talking about Freud and not developing many of the other fascinating ideas it introduces ContentThis is a fine read for what it sets out to do Lately I ve discovered the intentional fallacy the idea that a work or thing is not adeuately judged on the basis of what it does on an absolute basis but on the basis of what it intends to do making its success a function of its aim not its success This fallacy underscores the importance in criticism to weigh a work apart from what the author intended what resulted from that intention or what I would Deep Learning (Adaptive Computation and Machine Learning series) have done given the project The work must be valued apart from all intent to impart valueThat said I wish this survey wouldave gone on longer There are many ideas that are Critical Social Theory and the End of Work hinted at but not developed to a full degree The advantage of this is a broad easily accessibl. Doesumour make us The Traps human or do the cats and dogs laugh along with us On Humour is a fascinating beautifully written and funny book on whatumour can tell us about being uman Simon Critchle.

Book Ebook On Humour Thinking in Action Í Simon Critchley – chernov–

Simon Critchley born 27 February 1960 in Hertfordshire is an English philosopher currently teaching at The New School He works in continental philosophy Critchley argues that philosophy commences in disappointment either religious or political These two axes may be said largely to inform his published work religious disappointment raises the uestion of meaning and has to as he sees it de