A.E. Taylor: Aristotle



A.E. Taylor ã 6 Free read

Taylor was an early 20th c Platonist with a couple weird takes on Plato he believed that no development took place in the ideas of this great thinker during his half century of writing and he believed Plato never put an idea in his character Socrates mouth that didn t belong to the historical Socrates It s hard to imagine how anyone familiar with the Platonic corpus and its context could hold these views So Taylor was an intelligent well educated guy with weird judgment In this book we find in numerous places that Taylor had something a ot Galina like contempt for Aristotle Let s assume his weird views on Plato were considered plausible a century ago why would he be asked to write a brief introduction to the thought of someone he disliked so muchBut he was and he did And if you re unfamiliar with Aristotle thisittle book might seem Dead Boy like a serviceable survey of his thought The bullet points are there formalogic the four causes etc But it s written by someone with no real appreciation for Aristotle s thought who apparently never gave it careful consideration Conseuently it provides a simplistically inaccurate and overly negative picture of that thought It s true that Aristotle sometimes seems pedestrian or conservative in an unreflective way But right when you re starting to wonder where his reputation comes from he bowls you over with something you really have to chew on For years At east that s been my experience Why not get an introduction from someone who s done that rather than burning the book after passing the examAdler s Aristotle for Everyone is a decent short introduction by someone who took Aristotle seriously Lear s Aristotle The Desire to Understand is superb but reuires time and effort which are well worth it Surely there are others It s a mystery why this book is still in print This seems to me a good enough starting point into Aristotle s thought as any With an especially clear style Taylor takes us through writings on metaphysics epistemology physics and. Unabridged reprinting of the revised edition published in 1919 It's been completely reset contains a new index especially compiled for this edition by Geoffrey Mott SmithIn this brilliantly written popular account the.

free Aristotle – chernov–art.com

Corpus A decent and brief overview of Aristotle s ife and thoughts I would have appreciated if effort was taken to put his work into the historical context of scientific developments before and after his time so as to better understand his influence and innovation It was interesting to read about some of the ways see uote below in which he made bad conclusions and the impact this had on scientific progression This got me to reflect on the idea of public intellectuals making claims beyond their area of expertise and the trouble this can ead toSo far the spheres then were a mere kinematical hypothesis What Aristotle did and it is perhaps the most retrograde step ever taken in the history of a science was to convert the mathematical hypothesis into physical fact The spheres become with him real bodies and as none of the bodies we are familiar with exhibit any tendency to rotate in circles when eft to themselves Aristotle was forced to introduce into Physics the disastrous theory which it was a great part of Galileo s Eros Unbound (Great Loves, life work to destroy that the stuff of which the spheres are made is a fifth body different from the elements of which the bodies among which weive are made Taylor provides a good summary of Aristotle s philosophy He discusses the similarities and differences between Aristotle and Plato He also covers the influence of Aristotle on medieval thought Aristotle held the idea of God as a necessary being Necessary for holding reality together However Aristotle s God is not a creator nor can He hear our prayers He has no thoughts beyond Himself Aristotle also taught that the soul is the moral or ethical dimension of our being No one can be soulless since we all have the capacity for moral development However Aristotle held that ideas are not innate within us The book is a good overview It points to the positive influence Aristotle had on Ma mre m'a tu - Survivre au gnocide des Tutsis au Rwanda later thought in what he affirmed And it points to the detrimental effect of Aristotle s denials onater philosophy and theology. Logic; induction; theory of knowledge; the four causes; motion its eternity; God; terrestrial bodies; much Life worksThe classification of the sciences scientific methodFirst philosophy Physics Practical PhilosophyInd.

Ethics He breaks down each section with a short exposition of an idea and often relates it back to Plato and predecessors He also sometimes injects his own opinions often critical of Aristotle either pointing a missing ingredient an overstatement or simply a choice of premises which end up being wrong Taylor is most critical of A Physics which he said have blinded so his successors that it took a thousand year to recover the right path already established in Plato time of the move ability of the earth The most interesting sections were the ones on theory of knowledge and first philosophy which are well worth studying closely I have order his magnum opus on Plato which I think it is best to read and understand first before entering a serious study of Aristotle s thinking Interesting biography made me uestion many of my assumptions about the great philosopherscientist Will have to study the subject in the future Old books are the best books A revised edition of Taylor s 1919 publication this is an excellent concise readable 111 pages overview of Aristotle s thought which should greatly help the non specialist Taylor breaks Aristotle down into scientific method first philosophy physics and practical philosophy which includes not just ethics but a theory of the state There is also an introductory chapter on Aristotle s Mes recettes au baby-robot life and worksIiked how Taylor showed Aristotle s debt to his teacher and mentor Plato regarding nous or intuition Taylor remarks Aristotle holds that the knowledge of the principles of science is not itself science demonstrated knowledge but what he calls intelligence and we may call intellectual intuition T I read this book alongside assigned readings for Peter Maxwell s Loyola University Chicago s course The History of Ancient Philosophy and after reading several texts attributed to Aristotle himself As an introductory work to accompany the initial reading of Aristotle this book is to be recommended as providing an accessible broad overview of the entire. Foremost Platonist examines Aristotle's theories historical background influence present day application Dr Taylor covers the Greek philosopher's thoughts on classification of the sciences; scientific method; formal.

Alfred Edward Taylor was a British idealist philosopher He was born in 1869 the son of a Wesleyan minister Among many distinguished appointments he held the chair of Moral Philosophy at Edinburgh from 1924 to 1941 His main interests were Platonic philosophy and the theology of Christianity and his contributions in both these fields have been of far reaching importance Does God Exist was